On-Prem

Techie fired for inventing an acronym – and accidentally applying it to the boss

A tale of how a PEBCAK became a CLE


On Call On-Call, The Register's weekly column in which we share readers' stories of tech support trauma, usually opens with a short reverie about the approaching weekend.

This week we're just going to launch straight into an enthusiastic "TGIF" – the abbreviation for Thank God It's Friday – for reasons that will become apparent after we introduce you to a reader who we'll Regomize as "Hal".

"I had just gotten a job in Florida working as an in-house on-site tech support rep," Hal told On-Call.

It wasn't a happy job. "People really did not like tech support because they were a bit snobbish and off-putting." Well, that'll do it.

When Hal turned up to solve users' problems he tried to change their attitude by cheerfully telling them "Don't worry about it, just blame it on Sue."

"To me, Sue stood for Stupid UsEr," Hal told On-Call. And while that was not a kind thing to say, users seemed to like it – so Hal kept on referring to Sue as the source of every tech SNAFU.

Months later, the division in which Hal worked appointed a new boss.

Her name was Susan. But she preferred to go by Sue. Which was fine for her, but a most unfortunate coincidence for Hal.

Sue wanted to meet Hal and have him explain "who the hell this Sue person was and why she was breaking computers all across the network."

Hal couldn't see a way out of explaining the acronym he'd popularized.

That did not go well.

"She was not happy with this. In fact she was pissed. My job lasted exactly another two weeks before I was summarily dismissed."

Which is how a PEBCAK – a Problem Existing Between Chair and Keyboard – became a CLE – a Career-Limiting Event.

Has an acronym-related SNAFU left your career FUBAR? If so, click here to send your story to On-Call. Don't be shy, people: the On-Call mailbag could use a couple of extra entries. ®

Send us news
191 Comments

Making the problem go away is not the same thing as fixing it

The difference is especially stark at 2:00 AM

Workload written by student made millions, ran on unsupported hardware, with zero maintenance

Nobody minded for 20 years or so, until another student took action

Police ignored the laws of datacenter climate control

Hello, hello, what have we here, then? A dead Dell, if I'm not mistaken. Whodunnit?

Beta driver turned heads in the hospital

A portrait of one medico's contorted digital landscape

How is this problem mine, techie asked, while cleaning underground computer

If you throw enough mud, some of it will stick … and crash a server

Techie labelled 'disgusting filth merchant' by disgusting hypocrite

For once, the boss rescued IT from a revolting customer

PEBCAK problem transformed young techie into grizzled cynical sysadmin

Banks aren't very creative, which became an issue for one customer

I'll see your data loss and raise you a security policy violation

Engineer trumped angry user by pointing to the rulebook

Windows screensaver left broadcast techie all at sea

A Love Boat story that almost didn't have a happy ending

Resilience is overrated when it's not advertised

Successful failover can sometimes be a failure

The choice: Pay BT megabucks, or do something a bit illegal. OK, that’s no choice

We’ve dipped into the mailbag for more tales of rogue cabling and keyboard confusion

How to get a computer get stuck in a lift? Ask an 'illegal engineer'

Settle in for a weighty story with plenty of gravity